JNCI Cancer Spectrum

BackgroundAccelerometer-derived behavioral phenotype captures multidimensional aspects of human behavior extending well beyond physical activity, encompassing light exposure, step counts, physical activity patterns, sleep, and circadian rhythms. Whether these five domains constitute a unified behavioral architecture underlying cancer risk and whether circadian organization and light exposure confer incremental predictive value beyond movement volume alone remains to be comprehensively established. MethodsWe conducted an accelerometer-wide association study (AWAS) encompassing the complete accelerometer-derived behavioral exposome across five behavioral domains in UK Biobank participants with valid wrist accelerometry data. Incident solid cancers were designated as the primary endpoint, with prespecified site-specific solid cancers and hematological malignancy as secondary outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models with age as the timescale were used. The minimal covariate set served as the primary reporting tier, followed by sensitivity analyses additionally adjusting for adiposity/metabolic factors, independent activity patterns, shift work history, and accelerometry measurement quality. Nominal statistical significance was defined as two-sided P < 0.05 ResultsAmong 89,080 participants, 6,598 incident solid cancer events were observed over a median follow-up of 8.39 years. In the minimally adjusted model, the pan-solid-tumor association atlas was dominated by signals from activity volume, inactivity fragmentation, and circadian rhythm. Higher overall acceleration (HR per SD: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and higher daily step counts (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95) were independently associated with reduced solid cancer risk, while inactivity fragmentation metrics were consistently linked to higher risk. Notably, circadian rhythms, most prominently cosinor mesor (Midline Estimating Statistic of Rhythm under cosinor model), emerged as leading inverse risk signals, underscoring the independent contribution of circadian behavioral architecture. Site-specific analyses revealed pronounced heterogeneity across tumor sites. Lung cancer exhibited a robust inverse activity-risk gradient, while breast cancer showed reproducible associations with MVPA. Most strikingly, nocturnal light exposure demonstrated a tumor-site-specific association confined to pancreatic cancer, a signal absent across all other sites examined. Associations for uterine cancer were predominantly inactivity-related and substantially attenuated following adjustment for adiposity and metabolic factors. ConclusionsAcross five accelerometer-derived behavioral domains, solid cancers as a whole were most consistently associated with a high-movement, low-fragmentation, and circadian-coherent behavioral profile. While site-specific heterogeneity exists, the broad cancer risk landscape is dominated by movement volume, inactivity fragmentation, and circadian rhythmicity. Light exposure, although more localized in its contribution, demonstrates a potentially novel and specific association with pancreatic cancer risk. These findings support a five-domain behavioral exposome framework for cancer epidemiology and, importantly, position circadian rhythm integrity and nocturnal light exposure as critically understudied dimensions warranting dedicated mechanistic investigation.

BackgroundTreatment optimization in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) remains challenging, as recent de-escalation trials have shown limited success. Current patient selection strategies based on smoking history and TNM classification are insufficient, highlighting the need for robust, standardized prognostic biomarkers. We report the first validation of the Immunoscore (IS) for prognostic stratification in HPV-associated OPSCC. Patients and methodsWe analyzed 191 HPV-associated (p16+ and HPV DNA/RNA+) OPSCC patients from an international multicenter cohort (2015-2024), comprising a French monocentric retrospective training cohort (N = 48) and three validation cohorts: French monocentric retrospective (N = 48), French multicenter prospective (N = 50), and US multicenter retrospective (N = 45). IS is a standardized digital pathology assay quantifying CD3lJ and CD8lJ densities in tumor cores and invasive margins, with cut-offs defined in the training cohort and validated across cohorts. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, alongside 3RNA-seq and sequential immunofluorescence profiling of immune composition. ResultsMedian age 65; 80% male; 74% smokers; 66% T1-2; 82% N0-1 (AJCC8th). IS-High patients demonstrated superior 3-year DFS in the training and validation cohorts 1-3 (all log-rank P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified IS-Low as the strongest independent risk factor for DFS (HR 9.03; 95% CI: 4.02-20.31; P < 0.001). The model combining IS with clinical factors showed higher predictive accuracy for DFS (C-index 0.82) than clinical variables alone (0.7; P < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed for TTR and OS. IS-High tumors showed markedly higher enrichment of lymphoid and myeloid immune cell populations, contrasting with immune-poor signatures in IS-Low tumors. ConclusionsIS is a robust biomarker that outperforms standard clinical variables in both prognostic and predictive accuracy. The enriched cytotoxic immune infiltrate in IS-High tumors explains favorable outcomes and supports their suitability for treatment de-escalation. Prospective validation is warranted.

Background: Our group previously reported that lung cancer (LC) screening history results and subsequent timing of diagnosis are associated with significant differences in survival outcomes. As a follow-up study, we sought to develop novel personalized risk models that considered screening history for incidence cancers, interval LCs, and prevalence LCs. Methods: Using data from the CT-arm of the NLST, four independent case-control analyses were conducted to develop parsimonious risk models. Controls (n=26,038) were those never diagnosed with LC. The four LC case groups were 270 prevalence LCs, 44 interval LCs, 206 screen-detected LCs (SDLCs) that had a baseline positive screen, and 164 SDLCs that had a baseline negative screen. For each case-control analysis, univariable analyses identified statistically significant covariates from 48 variables and then significant covariates were included into a stepwise backward selection approach to identify a model with the most informative covariates. Results: For prevalence LCs, the model (AUC=0.711) included age, pack-years smoked, BMI, smoking status, smoking onset age, personal history of cancer, family history of LC, alcohol consumption, and milling occupation. For interval LCs, the model (AUC=0.734) included age, smoking status, smoking onset age, cigar smoking, marital status, and asbestos occupation. For baseline positive SDLCs, the model (AUC=0.685) included age, pack-years smoked, BMI, emphysema, chemicals/plastics exposure, and milling occupation. For baseline negative SDLCs, the model (AUC=0.701) included age, pack-years smoked, BMI, smoking status, emphysema, sarcoidosis, and sandblasting occupation. Conclusions: Besides smoking and age, which are inclusion criteria for screening, these models identified other important risk factors which could be used to provide personalized LC risk assessment and screening management.

BackgroundTimely cancer diagnosis in children and adolescents is critical to improving outcomes, yet substantial variation in diagnostic intervals persists across cancer types and care settings. We aimed to quantify time to diagnosis and assess variations by patient, demographic, and system-level factors. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based study of children and adolescents aged 0-19 years diagnosed with one of 12 common cancers between 2010 and 2022 in Quebec, Canada. The diagnostic interval was defined as the time from first cancer-related healthcare encounter to diagnosis. We calculated medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) overall and by cancer type and used multivariable quantile regression to identify factors associated with time to diagnosis at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. ResultsAmong 2,927 individuals with cancer, diagnostic intervals varied by cancer type and age. Median intervals were longest for carcinomas (100 days; IQR 33-192) and shortest for leukemias (8 days; IQR 3-44). Compared with children living in Montreal, living in regional areas and other large urban centres was associated with longer 50th and 75th percentiles of time to diagnosis for hepatic and central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Diagnostic intervals were shorter in the post-pandemic period (2020-2022) across several cancer sites, with CNS tumours showing reductions across all quantiles. InterpretationDiagnostic timeliness differed by cancer type, age, and rurality, but not by sex, material, or social deprivation. The shorter diagnostic intervals observed in the post-pandemic period suggest that pandemic-related changes in care pathways may have expedited diagnosis for some cancers.

Background and aims: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance is limited to individuals with familial or genetic risk although most future cases arise outside these groups. In a retrospective study, PRISM, an electronic health record (EHR)-based PDAC risk model, identified individuals in the general population at elevated near-term risk of PDAC. We aimed to prospectively evaluate whether PRISM can identify high-risk individuals beyond current surveillance groups across U.S. health systems. Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study after deployment of PRISM in April 2023 across 44 U.S. health care organizations. Eligible adults aged [&ge;]40 years without prior PDAC received a single baseline risk score and were assigned to prespecified risk tiers. Patients were followed for incident PDAC for 30 months. We estimated tier-specific 30-month cumulative incidence (positive predictive value, PPV), number needed to screen (NNS), standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and time from deployment and first high-risk flag to diagnosis. Results: Among 6,282,123 adults assigned a PRISM score, 5,058,067 had follow-up; 3,609 developed PDAC. The highest-risk tier had 30-fold higher PDAC incidence than the study population. At the SIR 5 threshold, 30-month cumulative incidence was 0.35% (NNS, 284.2); at SIR 16, 1.14% (NNS, 87.4); and at SIR 30, 2.19% (NNS, 45.7). Median time from deployment to PDAC diagnosis was 9.5 months, and median time from first high-risk flag to diagnosis at SIR 5 was 3.5 years. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses supported patient- and tier-level interpretability. Conclusions: Prospective deployment of PRISM across multiple U.S. health care organizations identified individuals at elevated near-term risk for PDAC, with substantial risk enrichment and lead time before diagnosis. These findings support the real-world scalability and generalizability of EHRbased risk stratification for risk-adapted early detection. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05973331

Background: Sezary syndrome (SS) is an aggressive leukemic variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with distinct clinical and biological features compared to rarer entities such as primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma (PCAECTCL). Although recurrent genomic alterations in CTCL have been described, comparative analyses at the pathway level across biologically divergent subtypes remain limited. Here, we leveraged a conversational artificial intelligence (AI) platform for precision oncology to enable rapid, integrative, and hypothesis-driven interrogation of publicly available genomic datasets. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of somatic mutation and clinical data from the Columbia University CTCL cohort accessed via cBioPortal. Cases were stratified into SS (n=26) and PCAECTCL (n=13). High-confidence coding variants were curated and mapped to biologically relevant signaling pathways and functional gene categories implicated in CTCL pathogenesis. Pathway-level mutation frequencies were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, with effect sizes quantified as odds ratios. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Subtype-specific co-mutation patterns were evaluated using pairwise association analyses and visualized through oncoplots and network heatmaps. Conversational AI agents, AI-HOPE, were used to iteratively refine cohort definitions, prioritize pathway-level signals, and contextualize findings. Results: TMB was comparable between SS and PCAECTCL (p = 0.96), indicating no significant difference in global mutational load. In contrast, pathway-centric analyses revealed marked qualitative differences. SS demonstrated enrichment of alterations in epigenetic regulators, tumor suppressor and cell-cycle control pathways, NFAT signaling, and DNA damage response mechanisms, consistent with transcriptional dysregulation and immune modulation. PCAECTCL exhibited relatively higher frequencies of alterations involving epigenetic regulators and MAPK pathway signaling, suggesting distinct oncogenic dependencies. Co-mutation analysis revealed a more constrained and focused interaction landscape in SS, whereas PCAECTCL displayed broader and more heterogeneous co-mutation networks, indicative of divergent evolutionary trajectories. Notably, ERBB2 mutations were significantly enriched between subtypes (p = 0.031), highlighting a potential subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerability. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SS is distinguished from PCAECTCL not by increased mutational burden but by distinct pathway-level architectures, particularly involving epigenetic regulation, immune signaling, and transcriptional control. These findings generate biologically grounded, testable hypotheses for subtype-specific therapeutic targeting and underscore the value of conversational AI as a scalable framework for accelerating discovery in translational cancer genomics.

BackgroundDespite extensive characterization of key oncogenic drivers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to exhibit profound molecular heterogeneity and inconsistent responses to standard therapies, including gemcitabine. The role of pathway-level alterations, particularly in the context of age at onset and therapeutic exposure, remains insufficiently defined. MethodsIn this study, we leveraged a conversational artificial intelligence framework (AI-HOPE-TP53 and AI-HOPE-PI3K) to enable precision oncology, driven interrogation of clinical and genomic data from 184 PDAC tumors, stratified by age at diagnosis and gemcitabine exposure. Using AI-enabled cohort construction and pathway-centric analyses, we evaluated alterations in TP53 and PI3K signaling networks, with findings validated through conventional statistical methods. ResultsTP53 pathway analysis revealed a significantly higher frequency of TP53 mutations in early-onset compared to late-onset PDAC among gemcitabine-treated patients (86.7% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.04), with a similar trend observed between treated and untreated early-onset cases (86.7% vs. 40%, p = 0.07). Notably, in late-onset PDAC patients not treated with gemcitabine, absence of TP53 pathway alterations was associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.011). Complementary analyses of the PI3K pathway demonstrated a higher prevalence of pathway alterations in late-onset gemcitabine-treated tumors compared to untreated counterparts (13.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.02). Importantly, among late-onset patients not receiving gemcitabine, those without PI3K pathway alterations exhibited significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.0001). ConclusionTogether, these findings identify distinct TP53 and PI3K pathway dependencies that are modulated by both age-of-onset and treatment exposure in PDAC. This work highlights the utility of conversational artificial intelligence in enabling rapid, integrative, and hypothesis-generating analyses within a precision oncology framework, supporting the identification of clinically relevant molecular stratification strategies for this aggressive disease.

Background. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a five-year survival rate of approximately 12%, largely because it is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. CT-based computational methods for early detection exist but rely on black-box deep learning or large texture feature sets without tissue-specific interpretability. Methods. We developed Virtual Spectral Decomposition (VSD), which applies six parameterized sigmoid functions S(HU) = 1/(1+exp(-alpha x (HU - mu))) to standard portal-venous CT, decomposing each pixel into tissue-specific response channels for fat (mu=-60), fluid (mu=10), parenchyma (mu=45), stroma (mu=75), vascular (mu=130), and calcification (mu=250). Dendritic Binary Gating identifies structural content per channel using morphological filtering, enabling co-firing analysis and lone firer identification. A 25-feature signature was extracted per patient. Three independent datasets were analyzed: NIH Pancreas-CT (n=78 healthy), Medical Segmentation Decathlon Task07 (n=281 PDAC, paired tumor/adjacent tissue), and CPTAC-PDA from The Cancer Imaging Archive (n=82, multi-institutional, with DICOM time point tags). The same six sigmoid parameters were used across all datasets without retraining. Results. VSD achieved AUC 0.943 for field effect detection (healthy vs cancer-adjacent parenchyma) and AUC 0.931 for patient-stratified tumor specification on MSD. On CPTAC-PDA, VSD achieved AUC 0.961 (6 features) and 0.979 (25 features) for distinguishing healthy from cancer-bearing pancreas on scans obtained prior to pathological diagnosis. All significant features replicated across datasets in the same direction: z_fat (d=-2.10, p=3.5e-27), z_fluid (d=-2.76, p=2.4e-38), fire_fat (d=+2.18, p=1.2e-28). Critically, VSD severity did not correlate with days-from-diagnosis (r=-0.008, p=0.944) across a range of day -1394 to day +249. Patient C3N-01375, scanned 3.8 years before pathological diagnosis, had VSD severity 1.87, well above the healthy mean of 0.94 +/- 0.33. The tissue transformation signature was temporally stable, indicating an early, persistent tissue state rather than a progressively worsening process. Conclusions. VSD with Dendritic Binary Gating detects a stable pancreatic tissue composition signature on standard CT that is present years before clinical diagnosis, validated across three independent datasets without parameter adjustment. The six sigmoid channels map to biologically meaningful tissue components through a fully transparent interpretability chain. The temporal stability of the signal implies a detection window of 3-7 years, consistent with known PanIN-3 microenvironment transformation timelines. VSD functions as a single-scan screening tool applicable to any abdominal CT performed during the pre-clinical window.

Introduction Lung cancer is rare before age 45, and its inherited genetic basis remains poorly defined. Methods We performed whole-genome sequencing in 171 predominantly young-onset lung cancer patients and integrated these data with whole-exome sequencing from six major lung cancer consortia, yielding 9,065 patients. After quality control, analyses focused on 6,545 individuals of European ancestry, the largest ancestral group. We compared the prevalence of rare pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants between 186 young-onset (age <45 years) and 6,359 older patients at gene and gene-set levels using Fisher's exact test, stratified by histology, sex, and smoking status. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from common variants were also evaluated. Results Young-onset patients carried a higher burden of rare germline P/LP variants in DNA damage response (DDR) genes (including BRIP1, ERCC6, MSH5), and in cilia-related genes, notably GPR161. At the pathway level, DDR genes were significantly enriched (OR=1.66, p=0.007), with the strongest signal in the Fanconi Anemia pathway and among females (OR=1.96, p=0.01). Enrichment was also observed in inborn errors of immunity pathways, with strongest signals in antibody deficiency and the complement system genes. Young-onset patients additionally exhibited higher lung cancer PRS. Conclusion Young-onset lung cancer exhibits a distinct germline genetic architecture, characterized by enrichment of rare P/LP variants in DDR, cilia-related, and immune pathways, and an elevated lung cancer PRS. These findings support a greater role for inherited susceptibility in early-onset disease and have implications for risk stratification, earlier screening, and precision prevention.

Background: Current deep learning models in computational pathology, radiology, and digital pathology produce opaque predictions that lack the explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) capabilities required for clinical adoption. Despite achieving radiologist-level performance in tasks from whole-slide image (WSI) classification to mammographic screening, these models function as black boxes: clinicians cannot trace predictions to specific biological features, verify outputs against established morphological criteria, or integrate AI reasoning into precision oncology workflows and tumor board decision-making. Methods: We present Virtual Spectral Decomposition (VSD), a modality-agnostic, interpretable-by-design framework that decomposes medical images into six biologically interpretable tissue composition channels using sigmoid threshold functions - the same mathematical structure as CT windowing. Unlike post-hoc xAI methods (Grad-CAM, SHAP, LIME) applied to black-box deep learning models, VSD channels have pre-defined biological meanings derived from tissue physics, providing inherent explainability without sacrificing quantitative rigor. For whole-slide image (WSI) analysis in digital pathology, we introduce the dendritic tile selection algorithm, a biologically-inspired hierarchical architecture achieving 70-80% computational reduction while preferentially sampling the tumor immune microenvironment. VSD is validated across three cancer types and imaging modalities: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on CT imaging, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) on H&E-stained pathology slides using TCGA data, and breast cancer on screening mammography. Composition entropy of the six-channel vector is computed as a visual Biological Entropy Index (vBEI) - an imaging biomarker quantifying the diversity of active biological defense systems. Results: In pancreatic cancer, the fat-to-stroma ratio (a novel CT-derived radiomics biomarker) declines from >5.0 (normal) to <0.5 (advanced PDAC), enabling early detection of desmoplastic invasion before mass formation on standard imaging. In lung cancer, composition entropy from H&E whole-slide images correlates with tumor immune microenvironment markers from RNA-seq (CD3: rho=+0.57, p=0.009; CD8: rho=+0.54, p=0.015; PD-1: rho=+0.54, p=0.013) and predicts overall survival (low entropy immune-desert phenotype: 71% mortality vs 29%, p=0.032; n=20 TCGA-LUAD), providing immune phenotyping for checkpoint immunotherapy patient selection from a $5 H&E slide without molecular assays. In breast cancer, each lesion type produces a characteristic six-channel fingerprint functioning as an interpretable computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for quantitative BI-RADS assessment and subtype classification (IDC vs ILC vs DCIS vs IBC). A five-level xAI audit trail provides complete traceability from clinical decision support output to specific biological structures visible on the original images. Conclusion: VSD establishes a unified, interpretable-by-design mathematical framework for explainable tissue composition analysis across imaging modalities and cancer types. Unlike black-box deep learning and post-hoc xAI approaches, VSD provides inherently interpretable, clinically verifiable cancer detection and immune phenotyping from standard clinical imaging at existing costs - without requiring foundation model infrastructure, specialized hardware, or molecular assays. The open-source pipeline (Google Colab, Supplementary Material) enables immediate reproducibility and extension to additional cancer types across the pan-cancer TCGA atlas.

BackgroundMulticancer early detection tests could be used for cancer screening, but may lead to harms, including false positive results and overdiagnosis of indolent tumours that would not have become clinically evident during that persons lifetime. We assessed the potential for these screening harms in the context of future population-based screening with a multicancer early detection test. MethodsWe used a microsimulation model to assess potential population-level impacts of screening at ages 50-75 years with a multicancer early detection test in Canada. We assumed high test specificity (97-99.1%) and test sensitivity increasing with cancer stage. The model includes latent indolent cancers that would not be diagnosed within that persons lifetime but can be overdiagnosed through screen-detection. We calculated the yearly and cumulative lifetime probabilities of screening overdiagnosis and false positive test results, assuming a range of preclinical screen-detectable periods (2-5 years). ResultsAn estimated 2.1-6.0% of all yearly screen-detected cancers with a multicancer screening test were predicted to be overdiagnoses across scenarios. The proportion of overdiagnosis varied by site, and strongly increased with age, going from 1% at age 50 to over 10% of screen-detected cancers by age 75. The test positive predictive value ranged from 15.9%-77.6%, meaning that there could be 0.3-5.3 false positives with no underlying cancer for every true cancer case detected by the test. ConclusionPopulation-level multicancer screening with a multicancer early detection test would likely not lead to substantial screen-related overdiagnosis. Healthcare systems should consider how screening false positives may increase their diagnostic service caseload.

Cancer-related casualties are the most common cause of death worldwide. The discovery of biomarkers is of utmost importance for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Herein, we performed a comprehensive metabolomics biomarker discovery effort in plasma from 615 lung, ovarian and colorectal cancer patients at diagnosis and 95 non-cancerous control subjects. This pan-cancer investigation identified specific panels of metabolites in the entire sample cohort with a high discriminating power and demonstrated by combined ROC AUC values of up to 0.95. The identified metabolites are mainly associated with lipid and amino acid metabolism as well as xenobiotic transformation. These metabolite panels of high predictive power provide new metabolic insights in these cancers and demonstrate the potential of metabolomics for improved diagnosis and monitoring disease progression.

Identifying individuals in the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is necessary for inclusion into future prevention trials. AD pathology occurs in the brain 20 or more years before diagnosis. In a nested 1:1 matched case-control sample of 426 participants selected from 19,500 members of the EPIC-Oxford cohort, we found that higher blood-based brain-derived and total p-tau 181, 217, and 231, as well as GFAP, were associated with AD over up to 25 years of follow-up (median=19.4, interquartile range 16.8-21.9 years). Of these seven biomarkers, LASSO regression selected brain derived p-tau 217 as the strongest discriminator of AD cases from controls. The AUC for brain derived p-tau 217 accounting for age, sex, and time of blood draw was 0.80, which increased to 0.82, 0.83, 0.84, after further addition of 1) APOE-e4 carrier status, 2) sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, and 3) both, respectively. Blood-based biomarkers, including the novel brain-derived p-tau 217, could identify individuals at-risk of AD two decades pre-diagnosis.

ImportanceAge-related eye diseases, such as cataract, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and diabetic retinopathy (DR), are leading causes of irreversible vision loss globally. Chronic inflammation is a shared pathogenic pathway, but the role of systemic inflammatory drivers like clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is unknown. ObjectiveTo investigate the association of CHIP, including its major genetic subtypes and clone sizes, with the risk of four major age-related eye diseases. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a prospective cohort study conducted using data from the UK Biobank, a large-scale, population-based cohort. A total of 436,469 participants free of the four eye diseases at baseline were included in the analysis. Data were collected from 2006 to 2010, with follow-up extending to March 2022. ExposuresCHIP status was ascertained from whole-exome sequencing data, defined by the presence of a somatic driver mutation with a variant allele fraction of 2% or greater. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were incident cases of cataract, glaucoma, AMD, and DR, identified through linked electronic health records. Associations were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. ResultsOf 436,469 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.4 [8.1] years; 54.5% women), 14,110 (3.2%) had CHIP. Over a median follow-up of 13.1 years, CHIP was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident cataract (Hazard Ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), AMD (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21), and DR (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.64). No significant association was found with glaucoma (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.17). The risk for AMD was primarily associated with smaller clones (VAF <10%), while the risk for DR was highest with non-DNMT3A mutations. Systemic inflammation, particularly neutrophil count, partially mediated the associations. Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, CHIP was independently associated with a higher risk of developing cataract, AMD, and DR, but not glaucoma. These findings establish a link between hematopoietic somatic mutations and the pathogenesis of several major age-related eye diseases, suggesting that CHIP-driven inflammation is a potential target for risk stratification and prevention. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) associated with the risk of major age-related eye diseases? FindingsIn this cohort study of 436,469 participants, CHIP was associated with an increased risk of incident cataract (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), age-related macular degeneration (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21), and diabetic retinopathy (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.64), but not glaucoma. MeaningThese findings identify CHIP as an independent, non-ocular risk factor for cataract, AMD, and diabetic retinopathy, suggesting that systemic inflammation driven by CHIP contributes to the pathogenesis of these conditions and may represent a novel target for preventive strategies.

Prehabilitation (PRH) is a preoperative process aimed at optimizing patients functional capacity to improve surgical outcomes and overall well-being. While its physical and cognitive benefits are increasingly documented, its emotional impact, particularly in neuro-oncology patients, remains less explored. This study assessed the psychological effects of a PRH program on 29 brain tumor patients. The primary outcome, emotional well-being, was measured using quality of life and emotional distress metrices. Secondary outcomes included perceived stress levels and control attitudes. Additionally, qualitative data from structured interviews provided further insights into the psychological effects of the intervention. The results indicated significant improvements in quality of life and reductions in emotional distress, particularly among women. While perceived stress levels remained stable, control attitudes showed an increase. Qualitative analysis further highlighted the positive changes in the control sense and identified additional factors, such as the importance of social support sources during the PRH process. Overall, these findings suggest that PRH interventions play a significant role in enhancing emotional well-being among neuro-oncological patients in the preoperative phase. These results underscore the importance of implementing comprehensive and personalized PRH approaches to optimize clinical status both before and after surgery, thereby promoting sustained psychological benefits in this population. This study is based on data collected at Institut Guttmann in Barcelona in the context of the Prehabilita project (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05844605; registration date: 06/05/2023).

Background: Stomach adenocarcinoma is driven by heterogeneity, limiting therapeutic success. Although ROS acts as a continuous redox rheostat for tumor evolution, it is categorized based on binary models that are masked by tumor-microenvironment (TME) confounders. Here, we have defined a continuous, TME-independent ROS axis to help identify intrinsic vulnerabilities and improve patient stratification. Methods: Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) defined a ROS-Axis in TCGA-STAD which was validated in ACRG Cohort. Multivariate regression model isolated intrinsic signatures via residual ROS scores by adjusting for TME confounders. Survival was assessed using Cox hazard models. Drug sensitivities were mapped using GDSC2/ElasticNet modeling with cross-cohort replication. Results: Our results define a reproducible ROS gradient, driven by effectors like NQO1 and SOD1, characterizing ROS-high tumors as proliferative, epithelial and immune -cold. High residual ROS score was associated with an improved prognosis, regardless of TNM stage and age. Pharmacogenomic mapping revealed an overlapping sensitivity to mTOR inhibitors in ROS-high gastric cancer tumors which persisted after TME confounder adjustment. Conclusion: The continuous ROS axis provides a functional readout of metabolic dependency that refines traditional anatomical staging. By identifying mTOR dependent cold tumors, our framework offers a precision strategy for immunotherapy-resistant patients like those affected by microsatellite-stable gastric cancer.

Although several ancillary tests are available in limited laboratories, diagnosis of microphthalmia (MiT)/TFE family translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) could be challenging due to diverse and overlapping tumor morphology and the lack of reliable biomarkers. GPNMB has been recently identified as a diagnostic marker for various renal neoplasms with FLCN/TSC/mTOR-TFE alterations. However, the sensitivity and specificity of GPNMB immunostain are suboptimal and the result interpretation in ambiguous cases could be difficult. To search additional biomarkers that could improve the screening sensitivity and predict genetic aberrations in FLCN/TSC/mTOR-TFE pathway in renal tumors, we performed bioinformatic analysis of publicly available cancer databases and found GPR143, a transmembrane protein regulated by MiT transcription factors, was highly expressed in a subset of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). In two the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) kidney cancer cohorts, RCCs with high levels of GPR143 expression were enriched for renal neoplasms with FLCN/TSC/mTOR-TFE alterations. Similar to GPNMB labeling, GPR143 immunostain was positive in the majority of tRCC cases and renal tumors with FLCN/TSC/mTOR alterations, suggesting that GPR143 could function as another surrogate marker for FLCN/TSC/mTOR-TFE alterations in certain renal tumors. Interestingly, despite the concordant GPR143 and GPNMB immunoreactivity in most renal neoplasms with FLCN/TSC/mTOR-TFE alterations, diffuse GPR143 immunostain was observed in some cases with negative or focal GPNMB labeling. Taken together, our results indicate GPR143 could serve as a useful adjunct marker to improve the sensitivity for screening renal tumors with FLCN/TSC/mTOR-TFE alterations.

Background: Predicting whether a treatment will demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit before committing to a large-scale trial remains a major unmet need in oncology. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) recapitulate individual tumor drug sensitivity, but have not been used to forecast population-level trial outcomes. We developed SCOPE (Screening-to-Clinical Outcome Prediction Engine), a platform that integrates PDO drug screening with clinical prognostic modeling to predict arm-level median progression-free survival (mPFS) and objective response rate (ORR) without access to any trial outcome data. Patients and methods: SCOPE was trained on 54 treatment lines from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC, n=15) and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC, n=39) with matched clinical data and PDO drug screening across 9 compounds. A Clinical Score module captures baseline prognosis; a Drug Screen Score module quantifies treatment-specific organoid sensitivity. To predict trial outcomes, synthetic patient profiles are generated from published eligibility criteria and matched to a biobank of 81 PDO lines. Predictions were externally validated against 32 arms from 23 published trials, treatment ranking was assessed across 8 head-to-head comparisons, and prospective applicability was tested for daraxonrasib (RMC-6236), a novel pan-RAS inhibitor in mPDAC. Results: Predicted mPFS strongly agreed with published outcomes (R2=0.85, MAE=0.82 months; Pearson r=0.92, P<0.001), approaching the empirical concordance between two independently measured clinical endpoints (ORR vs. mPFS, R2=0.87). ORR prediction was similarly robust (R2=0.71, MAE=7.3 percentage points). Integrating organoid and clinical data significantly outperformed either alone (P=0.001). SCOPE correctly identified the superior arm in 7 of 8 head-to-head comparisons (88%, P<0.05). Applied to daraxonrasib prior to phase 3 data availability, the platform predicted superiority over standard chemotherapy in KRAS-mutant mPDAC, consistent with emerging clinical data. Conclusion: By combining functional organoid drug screening with clinical modeling, SCOPE generates calibrated efficacy predictions for both established regimens and novel agents without prior clinical data. This approach could support clinical trial design, treatment arm selection, and go/no-go decisions, offering a new tool to improve the efficiency of gastrointestinal cancer drug development.

1.Study questionDo singletons conceived by medically assisted reproduction (MAR) experience an elevated incidence of childhood cancers and are they at a greater risk of such cancers compared to naturally-conceived singletons? Summary answerWe found no strong evidence the adjusted risk of childhood cancers is increased for MAR-conceived singletons. What is known alreadyThere is longstanding concern children conceived via MAR may be at increased risk of childhood cancer. Current epidemiological evidence does not support such a relationship. Study design, size, durationWe conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of 5,104,121 singletons born in Australia between 1991 and 2019. Median follow-up time varied from 4 to 10 years depending on mode of conception. Participants/materials, setting, methodsWe linked birth records to public medical insurance data of the mother to ascertain MAR conception. We classified treatment as ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination (OI/IUI) or assisted reproductive technology (ART; IVF/ICSI), with ART coded as either fresh embryo transfer or frozen embryo transfer. The cohort included 4,924,354 naturally-conceived singletons and 179,767 singletons conceived via MAR. We calculated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) to ascertain differences in population incidence of childhood cancer, and generated hazard ratios (HRs) using flexible parametric survival models controlling for key confounders. We report absolute incidence and risk differences for both statistical approaches. Main results and the role of chanceThere was no increase in the incidence or risk of all childhood cancers combined for singletons conceived via MAR, either any MAR or specific MAR types. There was some evidence the incidence of leukemias, myeloproliferative diseases, and myelodysplastic diseases was increased after ART compared to the general population (SIR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.02-1.68; equating to 2.09, 95% CI 0.13-4.44 extra cancers per 100,000 person-years), but no increased risk after adjusting for available confounders (HR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.46). These cancers showed increased incidence and risk for those conceived via IVF (SIR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.26; HR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.06-2.95), but not ICSI (SIR: 1.27, 95% CI 0.83-1.85; HR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.48-1.22). Incidence of renal tumours was elevated after IVF (SIR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.02-4.67; equating to 1.83, 95% CI 0.03-3.99 extra cancers per 100,000 person-years) and frozen transfer ART (SIR: 2.52, 95% CI 1.09-4.97; equating to 2.12, 95%CI 0.12-5.53 extra cancers per 100,000 person-years), however risk was not elevated after adjusting for available confounders (HR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.47-2.38; and HR: 1.63, 95% CI 0.73-3.61 respectively). Limitations, reasons for cautionWe did not have information on parental cause of infertility, which could be a confounder for childhood cancer, although we did adjust for parental history of cancer. For many specific cancer types, fewer than 50 cases were observed in total. Given the number of comparisons reported and closeness of the lower-bound confidence interval to 1, we cannot exclude that a significant association between conception via IVF and leukemias, myeloproliferative diseases, and myelodysplastic diseases reflects a type I error. Wider implications of the findingsOur findings align generally with published meta-analyses on the risk of childhood cancers following MAR conception and reinforce the need for very large studies to increase confidence. Parents who have conceived via MAR and their offspring can be reassured there is not strong evidence the treatments increase the overall incidence or risk of childhood cancer. Study funding/competing interest(s)This work was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC: APP1164852). Dr ARW declares that their involvement in this work was supported by employment at UNSW Sydney. Prof CMV declares payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1164852). Prof NH declares payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1164852); royalties and licenses for Berek and Hackets Gynecologic Oncology (Walters Kluwer); royalties and licenses for Hacker and Moores Essentials of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elsevier); consulting fees from Darwin Hospital and Gold Coast University Hospital; support for attending the British Gynaecological Cancer Society meeting in Aberdeen, UK, Jun 2023; support for attending the Symposium on Gynaecological Cancer in Budapest, Hungary, Nov 2023; support for attending the International conference of the Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Centre in Delhi, India, Mar 2025; and membership of the Medical Advisory Committee for TruScreen (Australia and New Zealand). A/Prof SO declares that they received payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1164852); they received a grant from the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (Open call 2022) including payment to their institution; and that they are a member of the Advisory Board of the Cervical Screening Program in Norway through The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), for which they were reimbursed travel expenses to their institution. Prof MC declares support for Theramex European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology registration and Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand registration and accommodation. A/Prof USD declares that her involvement in this work was supported via an Early Career Fellowship from the Cancer Institute NSW (ID: 2020/ECF1163) and employment at UNSW Sydney. A/Prof USD also declares payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2035240) and the Medical Research Future Fund (APP2032214; APP2038377), and the Australian Research Council (DP240100072) as well as current grants from NSW Health, Prince of Wales Hospital Foundation, and unpaid involvement as an Associate Editor for the "Journal of Psycho-Oncology Research and Practice". Prof LJ declares payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1164852). Prof RJN declares they are the Chair of the Clinical Advisory Committee, Westmead Fertility; External mentor at VinMec hospital; Editorial Editor at the journal "Fertility and Sterility"; and has received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for the NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Womens Health in Reproductive Life (CRE WHiRL). A/Prof CS declares stock or stock options associated with CSL Ltd, Sigma Healthcare Ltd, Resmed Inc, Medical Developments International Ltd, Vitrafy Life Sciences Ltd, Intuitive Surgical, and Steris PLC. Prof GMC declares payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1164852). Prof CV declares payment to their institution from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1164852); research grants receive from Merck KGaA and Ferring; payments for honoraria from Merk Ltd, Merk Sharpe & Dohme, Ferring, Organon, Gedeon-Richter for being an invited lecturer in scientific meetings/conferences on multiple occasions as well as member of advisory boards for these companies who have a commercial portfolio in the field of assisted reproduction technology (ART); and speaking fees from IBSA, Vianex, Sonapharm; travel support for their participation in scientific meetings/conferences both nationally and internationally, usually as an invited speaker for the following companies - Merck Ltd, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Ferring, Organon, Gedeon-Richter; unpaid involvement as a Board member of the Hellenic Society of Fertility and Sterility, Member of the Editorial Board of the journal "Human Reproduction", Senior Deputy of the Coordination Committee of the Special Interest Group "Reproductive Endocrinology" of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, Member of the Editorial Board of the journal "F&S Reviews", Member of the Editorial Board of the journal "RBM Online", Member of the Editorial Board of the journal "Reproductive Biology & Endocrinology", Member of the Editorial Board of the journal "Frontiers in Endocrinology", and Member of the Editorial Board of the journal "Reproductive Sciences". SubjectReproductive epidemiology

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting CD19 has transformed outcomes for children with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), yet the influence of molecular subtype on outcomes remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of cytogenetic and molecular signatures on complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), and leukemia-free survival (LFS) after CD19 CAR-T therapy in eighty-six pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel. CR was assessed 30 days after infusion. Cytogenetic data were available for 84 patients and molecular profiling for 62. Survival analyses included 72 patients who received CD19 CAR-T as the sole cellular therapy. Seventy-seven patients achieved CR (89.5%). Pre-infusion bone marrow blasts of [&ge;]20% were associated with lower CR rates (53.8% vs 95.9%, p<0.0001) and significantly reduced OS and LFS (both p<0.0001). Among molecular markers, RAS mutations correlated with inferior OS (p=0.0222) and LFS (0.0402). In multivariate analysis, bone marrow blasts >20% and RAS mutations independently predicted inferior OS. Post CAR-T, CD19 negative relapses showed almost twice higher prevalence of RAS mutations (66% vs 37.5%). These findings highlight RAS mutations as a key molecular predictor of outcome after CD19 CAR-T therapy and suggest emergence of unique risk stratification for patients receiving CD19-targeting therapy.